Continue reading...
"Clearly this area needs further research to find out if it's causative or not."
，更多细节参见同城约会
I wanted to test this claim with SAT problems. Why SAT? Because solving SAT problems require applying very few rules consistently. The principle stays the same even if you have millions of variables or just a couple. So if you know how to reason properly any SAT instances is solvable given enough time. Also, it's easy to generate completely random SAT problems that make it less likely for LLM to solve the problem based on pure pattern recognition. Therefore, I think it is a good problem type to test whether LLMs can generalize basic rules beyond their training data.
「如果你不知道對方的意識型態或立場，而引起他不愉快的話，你自己也不會很舒服。尤其他還是你重視的朋友的話。」